State Board of Elections
The enacted budget (May 16, 2002) makes no changes to the Executive Budget.
The Executive Budget recommends (analysis as of February 1, 2002):
· No change in the 46 FTE workforce. It is unclear how the 3.5% contractual raises will be funded when there is no increase in the personal services appropriation for the agency. According to the Assembly Ways and Means Committee, the $121,000 cost of the contractual raises were achieved by savings from management economies and efficiencies.
· A $300,000 increase in the non-personal service appropriation for the agency which is all for contractual services. This increase reflects the full annual cost of the leased space occupied by the Board. A $300,000 deficiency appropriation for SFY 2001-02 was also recommended by the Executive in order to pay for the Board’s lease in the current fiscal year.
|
State Board of Elections |
|||||
|
Program Details-State Operations |
|||||
|
|
Enacted |
Proposed |
Enacted |
Change in |
Percent |
|
Program |
2001-02 Budget |
2002-03 Budget |
2002-03 Budget |
Appropriation |
Change |
|
All Funds |
$3,301,000 |
$3,601,000 |
$3,601,000 |
$300,000 |
9.1% |
|
General Fund |
$3,281,000 |
$3,581,000 |
$3,581,000 |
$300,000 |
9.1% |
|
Special Revenue-Other |
$20,000 |
$20,000 |
$20,000 |
$0 |
0.0% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
_ |
|
Regulation of Elections |
$3,301,000 |
$3,601,000 |
$3,601,000 |
$300,000 |
9.1% |
|
Personal Service |
$2,466,000 |
$2,466,000 |
$2,466,000 |
$0 |
0.0% |
|
Nonpersonal Service |
$815,000 |
$1,115,000 |
$1,115,000 |
$300,000 |
36.8% |
|
Special Revenue-Other |
$20,000 |
$20,000 |
$20,000 |
$0 |
0.0% |