Civil Service Enforcement/Research Department

 

TO: Executive Board Members and Statewide Labor Management Chairs

FROM: Thomas E. Cetrino, Martin O’Connor, Susan Mitnick, Steve Connolly, and Mike Marinello

DATE: May 11, 2001

RE: The Impact of President Bush’s Proposed FY 2002 Budget on New York State

AFT, SEIU, and the Fiscal Policy Institute have been assisting PEF in gathering the documents necessary to assess the impact of President’s Bush’s proposed FY2002 budget on New York State. Part of the problem is that the President did not release his detailed proposed budget until April 2 in an effort to get his tax cut approved before anyone could assess its impact on programs funded by the federal government. In addition, the President’s budget includes numerous accounting gimmicks designed to make any increases in spending larger than then really are and any decreases smaller than they really are.

The President claims his FY2002 budget proposes an overall 4% increase in federal spending. This claim misrepresents the level of spending the President’s budget really proposes and this misrepresentation is related to how Congress appropriated funds for the 2001 budget. Congress used accounting gimmicks to make FY2001 funding levels appear lower than they actually are. The Congressional Budget Office (CBO) estimates that these gimmicks understate by $3.6 billion the overall level of spending for FY2001. (Some $2.1 billion of this amount occurs in education and another $1.3 billion occurs in other domestic programs.) Unfortunately, the figures the Bush Administration uses to claim it has proposed a 4% increase in federal spending include the $3.6 billion appropriated in FY2001 and count all of this amount as part of the FY2002 Bush budget "increase". The bottom line is that when the needed adjustments are made to eliminate both upward and downward distortions, the overall funding increase that the Bush budget contains for domestic appropriated programs in 2002 turns out to be 1.5 %, well below the rate of inflation. The Bush budget would cut funding for domestic discretionary appropriations by $9 billion next year and $50 billion over ten years, relative to the levels needed to maintain the programs at their current levels of service.

This large cut in domestic discretionary spending has significant implications for PEF as the State has moved a significant number of employees’ funding source from State-funded line to federally funded lines. In the Governor’s proposed budget for SFY2001-02 30% of State Operations programs are funded by the federal government. The federal share ranges from a high of over $3.4 billion for the Department of Health to nothing for several agencies including the Departments of Audit and Control, Banking and Insurance. Table 1 includes the federal share of the proposed SFY2001-02 State Operations "all funds" budget for each State agency that employs PEF members and the percentage it makes up of that agency’s overall budget. This table only shows federal money that goes directly to the agency. This under-represents the amount of federal funding for some agencies because their federal funding is not direct. OMRDD, for instance, receives $50 million in Medicaid funding but since it goes to patients first, the State budget refers to it as a Special Revenue-Other.

Our internationals have provided PEF with information from the Federal Funds Information for States (FFIS) database that estimates New York’s share for every federal grant program that provides money to state governments. We have just received New York’s estimated funding for each of these programs; overall New York will gain $1.64 billion in federal funds over the amount received in FY2001 under the President’s proposed budget for FY2002. However most of this gain is reflected in increased Medicaid funding for the State, which will increase by $1.915 billion in FY2002. Without the increased Medicaid funding the State will lose $271,171,000 in federal funding in FY2002. The major federal programs that will face significant cuts in the proposed FY2002 federal budget include (all losses are from NY’s FY 2001 share):

It is very difficult to match federal grants to the corresponding appropriation in the State budget for several reasons. The most significant problem is that the State budget does not refer to these grants by the name of the federal grant and often combines several federal grants into one appropriation. Another problem is that the federal and State fiscal years differ; the State’s fiscal year runs from April 1, 2001 to March 30, 2002 and the federal fiscal year runs from Oct 1, 2001 to September 30, 2002 (which is referred to as FY2002). That means the State appropriation in the SFY2001-2002 budget reflects six months of the FY2001 appropriation and six months of the FY2002 appropriation. It is also unclear as to whether the State appropriation reflects the federal appropriation or federal outlays, which is the actual cash the State receives for that grant in that specific year.

The following is an analysis of each major State agencies’ federal funding situation as relates to its State Operations budget. The analysis includes how much federal funding the Governor’s proposed SFY2001-02 budget includes for State Operations, the name of the agency’s major programs or grants in the State budget and their appropriation, and the major federal grants we believe the agency receives and its estimated FY2002 appropriation as proposed in President Bush’s FY2002 budget. Based on our analysis it appears that the Department of Transportation, Division of Criminal Justice Services, Department of Correctional Services, Crime Victims Board, Division of Parole, Department of Environmental Conservation, and the Department of Housing and Community Renewal may lose significant federal funding in FY2002 that could affect State employees’ jobs in SFY2001-02 or SFY 2002-03. It is less likely but possible that The Office of Children and Family Services and The Office of Temporary and Disability Assistance employees may also be impacted by federal budget cuts.

It is important that the Statewide Labor Management Chairs of these agencies meet with management as soon as possible to ascertain how they believe the proposed federal budget cuts will affect their workforce. PEF needs to get as much specific information as possible. We particularly need the name of the federal programs/grants that your agency uses to fund State employee positions. Staff from the Civil Service Enforcement/Research Department are available to participate in these meetings with agency management. Please call us if you would like us to attend these meetings with you or if you have any questions about the information in this memo. We will continue to keep you updated on the major developments concerning the State and federal budgets. Next week we will provide an analysis of the impact of President Bush’s proposed federal tax cuts on New York.

Public Protection and General Government

Department of Correctional Services

The Governor’s proposed SFY2001-02 budget appropriates $83,344,000 in federal funding for the agency’s State Operations budget. The major appropriations are all in the Administration Program and include:

The proposed FY2002 appropriations for federal grants that we believe may provide the above funding include:

 

Crime Victims Board

The Governor’s proposed SFY2001-02 budget appropriates $1,471,000 in federal funding for the agency’s State Operations budget. The major appropriations are all in the Administration program and include:

The proposed FY2002 appropriations for federal grants that likely provides the above funding include:

Division of Criminal Justice Services

The Governor’s proposed SFY2001-02 budget appropriates $45,787,400 in federal funding for the agency’s State Operations budget. The major appropriations are in the Funding and Program Assistance program and include: The proposed FY2002 appropriations for federal grants that we believe may provide the above funding include:

Division of Parole

The Governor’s proposed SFY2001-02 budget appropriates $6.7 million in federal funding for the agency’s State Operations budget. The major appropriations are in the Parole Operations program and include: The proposed FY2002 appropriations for federal grants that we believe may provide the above funding include:

Department of Law

The Governor’s proposed SFY2001-02 budget appropriates $28,735,800 in federal funding for the agency’s State Operations budget. All the appropriations are in the Criminal Prosecutions program and include:

The proposed FY2002 appropriations for federal grants that we believe probably provides the above funding include:

Division of State Police

The remaining appropriations are in the Patrol Activities program and include:

The proposed FY2002 appropriations for federal grants that we believe probably provides the above funding include:

 

Division of Veteran’s Affairs

 

Office General Services

The Office of Temporary and Disability Assistance and the Office of Children and Family Services may also receive funds from these federal programs.

Office for Technology

Health, Mental Health and Environmental Conservation Budget

Department of Health

Office of Alcoholism and Substance Abuse Services

 

Office of Mental Health

 

Commission on Quality of Care for the Mentally Disabled

Department of Environmental Conservation

In the past 30 years the federal funding has accounted for a increasing proportion of the DEC budget: growing from 4.6% of the DEC budget in 1970-71 to 16% of the DEC budget in SFY 2001-02.

Federal funds contribute $94.8 million dollars to the Governor's proposed budget. The bulk of these funds are found in the following program areas: Administration Program (Federal Operating Grants Fund - Indirect Costs Account $12.7 million), Air and Water Quality Management Program (Federal Operating Grants Fund - Federal Environmental Conservation Water Grants Account $30.2 million), Fish, Wildlife and Marine Resources Program (Federal Operating Grants Fund - Federal Environmental Conservation Fish, Wildlife, and Marine Grants Account $19.4 million)

The President's proposed FY2002 appropriations for federal grants that we believe may provide some funding for the above programs include:

Additional federal programs are funded as follows:

Transportation and Economic Development Budget

Department of Transportation

The President's budget proposes the following:

 

Department of Housing and Community Renewal

Federal funds account for approximately 10% or $8.6 million of the State Operations portion of the DHCR budget. These funds are found in the following program areas: Community Development (Dep't of Energy Weatherization Acct. - $3.1 million), Housing Program (Housing and Urban Development Section 8 Acct. - $5.5 million)

The President's budget proposes:

Department of Motor Vehicles

The DMV receives approximately 3.6%, or $8 million, of its state operations funding in the form of direct federal assistance. These federal funds are found primarily in the following program areas: Governor's Traffic Safety Committee (Highway Safety Section 157 Acct. $2.1 million), (Highway Safety Section 402 Acct $5.1 million), (Highway Safety Section 403 Acct. $700,000)

The President's budget proposes:

Education, Labor, and Family Assistance Budget

State Education Department (Note FY2002 runs from October 1, 2001 through September 30,2002)

 

Department of Labor

The Department of Labor receives $554,873,900 in federal funding in the 2001-02 Executive Budget. This money is primarily accounted for in the Administration Program's Unemployment Insurance (UI) Administrative Fund, which is budgeted to receive $518,830,900. Most of the remaining federal funding is in the Unemployment Insurance Benefit Program's UI Occupational Training Fund which is funded at $35,600,000. Based on the above it is difficult to know how or if the changes shown below will impact state staff. It appears as though the NYSDOL lumps all funding from the federal government into the UI programs and then disperses from there. An example is that the Disabled Veterans' Outreach Program certainly uses state employees yet there is no federal funding shown in any program but UI.

 

The Office of Children and Family Services (OCFS) and the Office of Temporary and Disability Assistance (OTADA) will be listed together here since it is impossible to figure out to which agency the money from the federal government is going.

Office of Children and Family Services

The Executive Budget includes federal funding at the level of $82,248,000 for fiscal year 2001-02. This is broken down as follows:

Office of Temporary and Disability Assistance

The Executive Budget includes federal funding at the level of $311,670,000 for fiscal year 2001-02. This is broken down as follows:

The Federal Budget projections for these program areas are as follows:

The net change for all of the programs listed above is an increase of $64.8 million. You must keep in mind though, that we do not know how much of this money, if any, goes to support state positions.